In reference to a recent post, I received the following question:
1 comment:
AnonymousNovember 29, 2014 at 6:53 AM
Just one question is this relationship a complete slave and master one? Coz it sounds like it.
The simple answer (if there were such a thing) is, "No." That said, of course, these terms and how they are applied within individual relationships vary from couple to couple. As you've read (if you've been one of my readers for any length of time), for example, I believe the following:
1. Being a, 'Daddy' is by its very nature a dominant role.
2. Being a 'lad' or 'son' or 'boy' is by its nature a submissive role.
3. The interchange between the dominant individual and the submissive one reaches its apex in the sexual part of the relationship. Outside of the sexual part, for a relationship to last, it needs to be one of relative equality. Perhaps there is a 'senior partner' and a 'junior' one, but in the more mundane parts of any relationship, the healthiest formula is one of equality and fairness.
4. Just because an old guy likes to bottom for hot, younger guys, doesn't make him a, 'Daddy.'
These (and many more) are all ideas which I support and which I practice when in a relationship. Lots of other folks disagree heatedly. Trust me, you should see the flaming comments, emails, IM's, etc. whenever I post or otherwise 'speak' on this topic.
So, since I am only an expert in what I believe, I've decided to provide some information (in a series of posts to follow )which describes how others see the differences and the similarities in these sorts of relationships.
I don't think any 'docturine' applies in every, single case. Variety is the spice of life, now isn't it?
At least, that is what THIS DADDY thinks.
